-----------------------------------------
To whom it may concern :
It has come to my attention that your Bridge partnership has violated the copyright aspect of my clients E-mails. It is purported that you, without seeking permission, used these e-mails maliciously to win a sectional event at Red Deer. To make matters much worse my client was relegated to 2nd behind your E-mail using partnership.
The fine print on all my e-mails clearly state that the contents after being read must be immediately forgotten. Tom Gandolfo, a very law abiding citizen, does this on a regular basis. Apparently you used Exclusion instead of a 5 level cue-bid to win all the matchpoints on board # 23 getting to a very nice slam. This is a clear violation of the copyright laws of the district of Red Deer and south to Okotoks.
What is the use of my client writing these E-mails, if your partnership is going to turn the tables and use them against him? Have you no compassion? No sense of justice? At least you can do what Susan Culham does. Read the E-mails and immediately disagree with the contents and do the opposite of what the e-mails say. Do you see Susan relegating me and my partner to 2nd in events? No way.
You will be advised in writing the time and place of your hearing.
Robert Shortt
Barrister and 2nd place victim
This was actually written by Bob